Write a PESTLE analysis about HMV Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Write a PESTLE analysis about HMV - Essay Example Nonetheless, the 2008 crisis caused this to change in May 2010. In addition, the heavy debt on UK has caused the British government to instil much nationalisation aimed at supporting its economy. The British government has indicated a lot of support for the fight against piracy. The Digital Economic Act 2010 has propagated the pursuance and arrest of persistent offenders with music labels and movie companies tracking illegal downloads from peer to peer networks using IP addresses. Despite the negative impact of the financial crisis, the UK remains the third biggest European economy (Central Intelligence Agency 2011). Its inflation and public debt grew from 3.3% to 2.2% and 68.2% to 76.5% respectively. With a GDP of USD 2.259 trillion in 2010, the unemployment rate also grew from 7.6% in 2009 to 7.9% in 2010. The country ranked 9th in 2010 in terms of purchasing parity which had increased from USD 2.268 trillion to 2.154 trillion to 2.189 trillion from 2008 through 2009 and 2010 respectively. The British government’s Environmental Protection Act 1990 cited by the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2004) prohibits the firm from polluting the environment. The social analysis of the UK ranks it 22nd globally in population having 62,689,362 people as of July 2011, with the median age being 40 (Office for National Statistics 2011). The literacy level stands at 99% with urbanization being at 80% as of 2010. The British are known to be conscious of their benefit in purchases including quality, price, environment and brand. The country has musicians and bands in traditional and contemporary music. Expenditure on research and development in the UK stood at â‚ ¬29.824 billion, which represents 1.84% of its GDP (Office for National Statistics 2011). There have been indications that the digital infrastructure in the country does not suffice in speed and penetration and therefore need to be improved (British Council for Science and Technology, 2010).

Criminology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 3

Criminology - Essay Example Discussion The key ideological disparity between positivist theorists and classical theorists is how the two categories differentiate how some individuals are increasingly more prone to crime than others. For instance, classical theorists believe that individuals engage in criminal acts entirely on their own will while positivist theorists assert that people commit crimes outside their free will (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 45). Classical school of thought that developed in the 17th century anchored on philosophy of utilitarianism. Cesare and Jeremy, as well as other classical thinkers, believed that human beings have free will to direct the choice of their actions, and the deterrence is anchored on the idea of a person as a hedonist being that seeks satisfactions and prevents discomfort, and a ‘reasonable calculator’ estimating the cost and advantages of each action’s results (Hagan 10). Therefore, the school of thought objects the chances of irrationality and involu ntary desires as triggering aspects. In addition, they believe that punishment (of adequate difficulty) can prevent human beings from criminal acts, as the loss (sentence) outweighs advantages, and the difficulty of penalty should be equal to the offense. Classical philosophers suggest that the more swift and precise the penalty (sentence) is, the more efficient it is in preventing crime attitudes. Cesare and other classical philosophers asserted that criminal attitudes or behavior could be reduced through human nature basics (O'Brien and Majid 47). According to classical theorists, criminal behavior is regulated by people’s self-interests. Theorists argued that rational human beings join a social contract where they recognize that maintaining a harmonious society would benefit them. Cesare and his colleagues sought to minimize criminal acts and behavior through reforms to the system of criminal punishment that they saw as hostile, unreasonably excessive and ineffective deter rent. The key purpose of sentencing was to deter criminal behavior among people. Classical theorist believed that the most crucial efficient deterrent from crime would be abrupt penalties instead of a long sentence of trials (Shteir 10). They considered criminal acts as irrational behaviors that resulted from individuals who could not behave from their free will or in society’s interests. They contended that penalties should be constantly imposed for certain criminal acts, with no unique circumstances, to show people that crime will cost them since there are fixed effects. Classical school proponents sought fair and equal justice for crime suspects. Prior to classical ideology, judges punished offenders at their own interests irrespective of the crime severity, an act that made some people perceive the system of a criminal sentence as tyrannical. Consequently, Cesare and his colleagues struggled for penalties for certain offenses to be controlled by legislative arm and forbid unleashing power. They believed that if legal officers could use legislatively authorized penalties, trials would be swift and there would be fair justice because offenders would receive faster and fair punishment (O'Brien and Majid 50). The classical theorist thought that combating crime is increasingly crucial than punishment, but by setting clear system of punishment offenders would utilize their reasoning to realize that criminals behavior is against their self-interests. Similarly,